The Yanny/Laurel Debate Is a Perfect Metaphor for Information in the Trump Age
Late Monday night, a social media influencer shared a four-second audio recording of a single word, along with a seemingly-benign poll: is the word being said ‘Yanni’ or ‘Laurel’?
And just like that, what you might have once considered unassailable—your ability to hear, process and assimilate something without a hitch, thank you very much—is up for debate. (And it’s not just a question of one or the other; some people are reporting hearing both, when played at different times and/or on different devices. According to a linguist in a piece for the Atlantic, “by changing the pitch of the recording, you could adjust what you heard.”) Of course, this isn’t the first time we—and by that I mean the Internet—have been divided over matters of perception. You may remember a little dispute in 2015 over “the dress,” the one whose colours no one could conclusively agree on. (I’m Team White & Gold, in case you were wondering.) Optical illusions are nothing new either; they’re age-old phenomena that we’ve come to accept, if not entirely understand, as a “trick of the eye.” But auditory illusions? In which two people sitting right next to each other listening to the same recording at the same time on the same device can hear two wildly different things? Well, that’s some Trump-era manipulation right there. (Insert alternative facts joke here. Except it’s not funny. It’s really not.)
So of course 2018 was going to be the year of Laurel vs Yanny. Versions of this debate (albeit far more serious ones) have been playing out since 2016, also known as the year the unthinkable happened. Ever since, the United States—nay, the world—got split into two near-clean factions: pro-Trump and anti-Trump. Two sides that staunchly believe in the integrity of what they see and hear, and are adamant (even outraged) that there could be another faction that sees things differently… sound familiar?
it's so clearly laurel. I can't even figure out how one would hear yanny.
— christine teigen (@chrissyteigen) May 15, 2018
But honestly, in this era of real news vs fake news, is it really a surprise to be confronted with something that presents itself as fact, but whose veracity can’t actually be taken for granted? After all, we now live in a world where anything true can be declared “fake” if we don’t agree with it, and things that seem true might in fact be spurious.
The Fake News Media is reporting that You hear Laurel, when it’s Obvious that it’s YANNY! SAD! pic.twitter.com/N6tKSz8rNL
— Andy Rosenberg (@AndyTheGiant) May 16, 2018
So, like with everything you see, read or hear in this time of Trump, take it with a grain of salt. Question everything. Even yourself.
https://twitter.com/StephenAtHome/status/996563741637513216
 Of course, this isn’t the first time we—and by that I mean the Internet—have been divided over matters of perception. You may remember a little dispute in 2015 over “the dress,” the one whose colours no one could conclusively agree on. (I’m Team White & Gold, in case you were wondering.) Optical illusions are nothing new either; they’re age-old phenomena that we’ve come to accept, if not entirely understand, as a “trick of the eye.” But auditory illusions? In which two people sitting right next to each other listening to the same recording at the same time on the same device can hear two wildly different things? Well, that’s some Trump-era manipulation right there. (Insert alternative facts joke here. Except it’s not funny. It's really not.)
So of course 2018 was going to be the year of Laurel vs Yanny. Versions of this debate (albeit far more serious ones) have been playing out since 2016, also known as the year the unthinkable happened. Ever since, the United States—nay, the world—got split into two near-clean factions: pro-Trump and anti-Trump. Two sides that staunchly believe in the integrity of what they see and hear, and are adamant (even outraged) that there could be another faction that sees things differently… sound familiar?
https://twitter.com/chrissyteigen/status/996527982243033088
But honestly, in this era of real news vs fake news, is it really a surprise to be confronted with something that presents itself as fact, but whose veracity can’t actually be taken for granted? After all, we now live in a world where anything true can be declared “fake” if we don’t agree with it, and things that seem true might in fact be spurious.
https://twitter.com/AndyTheGiant/status/996762903402467328
So, like with everything you see, read or hear in this time of Trump, take it with a grain of salt. Question everything. Even yourself.
https://twitter.com/StephenAtHome/status/996563741637513216){kind=link}